Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Feldman Karpa v Mexico, Award and Dissenting Opinion, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1, (2003) 18 ICSID Rev-FILJ 488, IIC 157 (2002), (2005) 7 ICSID Rep 341, (2003) 42 ILM 625, despatched 16th December 2002, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Reporter(s)

Dr Georgios Petrochilos

Feldman Karpa v Mexico, Award and Dissenting Opinion, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/1, (2003) 18 ICSID Rev-FILJ 488, IIC 157 (2002), (2005) 7 ICSID Rep 341, (2003) 42 ILM 625, despatched 16th December 2002, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Investment Claims (http://oxia.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. date: 14 October 2019

Whether Mexico's actions could be considered as an expropriation under Article 1110 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (‘NAFTA’).

Whether Mexico treated the Claimant's investment according to the national treatment standard of Article 1102 of the NAFTA.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.