Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
American Manufacturing & Trading, Incorporated v Zaire, Award and separate opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/93/1, 5 ICSID Rep 14, 12 Intl Arbitration Rep nº 4, IIC 14 (1997), 11th February 1997, despatched 21st February 1997, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

American Manufacturing & Trading, Incorporated v Zaire, Award and separate opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/93/1, 5 ICSID Rep 14, 12 Intl Arbitration Rep nº 4, IIC 14 (1997), 11th February 1997, despatched 21st February 1997, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

From: Investment Claims (http://oxia.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. date: 23 October 2019

Whether the consent of a Contracting State to a BIT creates an obligation on its nationals to arbitrate disputes under the treaty.

Whether an investment is made through share capital of an entity incorporated in a host State eligible for protection under a BIT.

What the minimum standard of treatment is that a host State is obligated to accord to a foreign investor under international law.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.