Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation

IX Consent to Arbitral Jurisdiction

Sabahi Rubins

From: Investor-State Arbitration (2nd Edition)

Borzu Sabahi, Noah Rubins, Don Wallace, Jr.

From: Investment Claims (http://oxia.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. date: 17 September 2021

Subject(s):
Investor — Conduct of proceedings — Consent to jurisdiction

This chapter describes the concept of consent to arbitral jurisdiction. The consent of the parties is the basis of the jurisdiction of all international arbitration tribunals. The requirement of consent to arbitral jurisdiction in the context of investor-state arbitration is also a corollary of the principle that ‘there is no power superior to the states which can force a judge upon them’. States and private entities or individuals may express their consent to binding dispute resolution in a variety of ways. Today, states typically provide their consent to submit future investment disputes to arbitration through bilateral investment treaties (BITs), multilateral treaties, or the state’s own domestic legislation. It is generally accepted that once a state has given its consent to arbitrate investment disputes and this consent has been perfected, it cannot be revoked unilaterally. When an investor accepts the state’s open offer to arbitrate, a valid and binding agreement is created between the parties.

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.