Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Mobil Exploration and Development Inc Suc Argentina and Mobil Argentina SA v Argentina, Decision on jurisdiction and liability and dissenting opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/04/16, IIC 1534 (2013), despatched 10th April 2013

Mobil Exploration and Development Inc Suc Argentina and Mobil Argentina SA v Argentina, Decision on jurisdiction and liability and dissenting opinion, ICSID Case No ARB/04/16, IIC 1534 (2013), despatched 10th April 2013

From: Investment Claims (http://oxia.ouplaw.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. date: 16 September 2019

1. The Claimants are Mobil Exploration and Development Argentina Inc. Suc. Argentina (“ MEDA ”) and Mobil Argentina Sociedad Anónima (“ MASA ”) collectively referred to as the “Claimants.” 2. The Respondent is the Argentine Republic and is hereinafter referred to as “ GOA ”, the “ Government of Argentina ”, “ Argentina ” or the “ Respondent .” 3. The Claimant and the Respondent are hereinafter collectively referred to as the“ Parties .” 4. On 19 December 2003, the Claimants filed a Request for Arbitration (the “ Request ” or “ RFA ”) against the Argentine Republic...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.