Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.
Contents
- Preliminary Material
- Dedication
- Series Editor’s Preface
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Contents
- Table of Cases
- Investor-State Arbitral Tribunals
- European Commission of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights
- European Court of Justice
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights
- International Court of Justice
- International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
- Iran–US Claims Tribunal
- Mixed Claims Commissions
- Permanent Court of International Justice
- State-To-State Arbitral Tribunals
- UN Human Rights Committee
- Other International Decisions
- National Court Decisions
- Table of Legal Instruments
- List of Abbreviations
- Main Text
- 1 Introduction and Delimitation of the Subject
- 2 Characteristics of the International Investment Framework Leading to Multiple Proceedings
- Preliminary Material
- 2.01
- 2.02
- 2.03
- A Multiple Sources of Claims of Investors
- B Multiple Participants in an Investment Operation
- 2.32
- 1 Multiple entities involved on the side of the investor
- 2 Multiple entities involved on the side of the host state
- C Multiple Forums for Investor-state Disputes
- D Summary of Key Findings
- 3 Determining the Jurisdictions of Competing Forums in the Context of Investment Disputes
- Preliminary Material
- 3.01
- 3.02
- 3.03
- A The Need to Differentiate Between Different Types of Claims when Determining the Jurisdictions of Competing Forums
- B Integrationist and Disintegrationist Approaches to Jurisdiction
- C Jurisdiction-conferring Mechanisms Under IIAs
- D Jurisdiction-conferring Mechanisms Under Domestic Investment Laws
- E The Notion of Forum Selection Options
- 3.35
- 3.36
- 3.37
- 3.38
- 3.39
- 1 Original jurisdiction preceding the exercise of a forum selection option
- 2 Scope of jurisdiction of the selected forum
- 3.54
- a Types of claims covered by a forum selection option
- 3.55
- (1) Forum selection option under a treaty
- (2) Forum selection option under domestic investment law
- (3) Extension of forum selection options to human rights claims and claims under general public international law
- b Limitation of an option’s exercise to a specific set of facts
- 3 Transfer of jurisdiction through the exercise of a forum selection option
- F General Waiver of Forum Selection Options
- G Extinction and Limitation of Forum Selection Options with Regard to Specific Disputes
- H Conclusion
- I Summary of Key Findings
- 4 Mechanisms for the Coordination of Multiple Investment Proceedings
- Preliminary Material
- 4.01
- 4.02
- 4.03
- 4.04
- 4.05
- 4.06
- 4.07
- A Coordination of Proceedings Based on an Explicit Agreement Between the Parties: Consolidation and Quasi-consolidation
- B Coordination of Proceedings in the Absence of an Explicit Agreement Between the Parties: Vertical, Horizontal, and Overarching Mechanisms
- 4.41
- 4.42
- 4.43
- 4.44
- 4.45
- 4.46
- 4.47
- 4.48
- 1 Vertical coordination of proceedings where the relationship between two forums is hierarchical
- 2 Horizontal mechanisms for the coordination of proceedings in the absence of hierarchy: lis pendens and res judicata
- 3 General coordination mechanisms with overarching application to both hierarchical and non-hierarchical situations
- C The Link Between Agreed Coordination and Default Coordination Mechanisms
- D Summary of Key Findings
- 5 Hierarchy as a Coordinative Mechanism in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Preliminary Material
- 5.01
- 5.02
- A Hierarchy of Forums Based on the Mechanism Establishing Them
- B Hierarchy of Forums Based on the Claims on Which They Decide
- 5.21
- 1 The standard of review in treaty proceedings with regard to decisions of domestic courts
- 2 The standard of review in treaty proceedings with regard to decisions of non-treaty tribunals
- C Consequences Regarding the Appropriateness of the Different Mechanisms for the Coordination of Proceedings Before Treaty Tribunals
- D Summary of Key Findings
- 6 The Application of Lis Pendens and Res Judicata in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Preliminary Material
- 6.01
- A The Law Applicable to the Coordination of Proceedings Through Principles of Lis Pendens and Res Judicata Before a Treaty Tribunal
- 6.02
- 1 The law applicable to the coordination of proceedings through the principle of res judicata
- 6.03
- 6.04
- 6.05
- a Procedural law of the treaty tribunal
- b Substantive law in the arbitral proceedings
- c Lex fori of the first decision
- d International standards
- e Assessment
- 2 The law applicable to the coordination of proceedings through the principle of lis pendens
- B Lis Pendens and Res Judicata Under Public International Law
- 6.40
- 1 Res judicata
- 6.41
- a Does res judicata constitute a principle of general international law?
- b The requirements of res judicata under public international law
- c The effect of the principle of res judicata under public international law
- 2 Lis pendens
- C Consequences for the Application of Lis Pendens and Res Judicata in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- 6.100
- 1 The non-application of a strict lis pendens rule
- 2 The application of the concept of res judicata in investment treaty arbitration
- D Summary of Key Findings
- 7 Overarching Principles for the Coordination of Multiple Proceedings
- Preliminary Material
- 7.01
- A The Principle of Comity
- B The Prohibition of Abuse of Process
- C Summary of Key Findings
- 8 Summary of Results and Outlook
- Further Material
