Users without a subscription are not able to see the full
content. Please,
subscribe
or
login
to access all content.
Contents
- Preliminary Material
- Series Editor’s Preface
- Foreword
- Contents
- List of Annulment Cases
- Table of Cases
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- ADC
- AES
- Aguas del Tunari
- Amco I
- Amco II
- Azurix
- Bayindir (Decision on Jurisdiction)
- CDC
- CMS
- Continental Casualty
- Duke
- Enron
- Fraport
- Helnan
- Kardassopoulos and Fuchs
- Klöckner I
- Klöckner II
- Libananco
- Lucchetti
- Lucchetti (Rectification)
- Malaysian Salvors
- MCI Power
- MINE
- Mitchell
- MTD
- Nations Energy
- Pey Casado
- Repsol
- Rumeli
- Saipem
- Salini
- Sempra
- Soufraki
- SPP
- Suez
- Togo Electricité
- Vieira
- Vivendi I
- Vivendi II
- Wena
- International Court of Justice
- Canada
- United States
- UNCITRAL
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
- Table of Legislation
- List of Abbreviations
- Main Text
- Part I General Framework and Fundamental Observations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Article 52 of the ICSID Convention
- 3 Finality of ICSID Awards
- 4 Additional Considerations Regarding the ICSID Annulment Mechanism
- Part II Grounds for Annulment
- 5 Improper Constitution of Tribunal
- 6 Manifest Excess of Powers
- Preliminary Material
- 6.01
- A The Tribunal’s Powers under the Convention
- B The Drafting of Article 52(1)(b)
- C The Applicable Standard
- D Manifest Excess of Powers Involving Jurisdictional Matters
- E Manifest Excess of Powers for Failure to Apply the Proper Law
- 1 General observations
- 2 Determination of the applicable law
- 3 Partial Application of the governing law
- 4 Manifest excess of power for failure to apply the governing law and error of law
- 5 ICSID practice on Article 52(1)(b) and applicable law
- 6 Manifest excess of powers by permitting claimant to assert claims on behalf of other investors
- 7 Failure to state reasons as a manifest excess of powers
- F Conclusion
- 7 Corruption of One of the Members of the Tribunal
- 8 Serious Departure from a Fundamental Rule of Procedure
- Preliminary Material
- 8.01
- 8.02
- 8.03
- A Rules of Procedure under the ICSID Convention
- B The Drafting of Article 52(1)(d)
- C The Applicable Standard and the ‘Serious’ and ‘Fundamental’ Nature Requirements
- D ICSID Practice under Article 52(1)(d)
- E Manifest Excess of Powers and Failure to State Reasons as a Serious Departure from a Fundamental Rule of Procedure
- F Conclusion
- 9 Failure to State Reasons on which the Award is Based
- Preliminary Material
- 9.01
- 9.02
- A The Tribunal’s Obligation to Provide Reasons
- B The Drafting of Article 52(1)(e)
- C The Applicable Standard
- D ICSID Practice on Article 52(1)(e)
- E Failure to Address Every Question Submitted to the Tribunal
- F Conclusion
- 10 Scope of Annulment Regarding Specific Issues
- Part III Annulment Procedure
- 11 Annulment Procedure
- Preliminary Material
- 11.01
- A The Application for Annulment
- B Waiver
- C Constitution of the Annulment Committee
- D Substantiation
- E Powers and Functions of the Committee
- F The Decision on Annulment
- G Requests for Interpretation, Supplementation, and Rectification of Annulment Decisions
- H Recognition and Enforcement of Annulment Decisions
- 12 Stay of Enforcement and Guarantees
- Preliminary Material
- A The Convention
- B Circumstances Leading to the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
- C The Request to Post Security
- 11 Annulment Procedure
- Part IV Additional observations
- Part I General Framework and Fundamental Observations
- Further Material
