We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.
Find out more
Jump to Content
Jump to Main Navigation
User Account
Personal Profile
See all online law products
More
About
Guided Tour
Subscriber Services
FAQs
Help
Contact Us
Search
Browse all
Content type
Case reports
Arbitral cases
Commentary and analysis
Book content
Journal articles
Yearbook articles
Investment treaty overviews (by jurisdiction)
Treaties
Multilateral treaties
Bilateral investment treaties
Other instruments and materials
Arbitral rules
Author
Arbitrators and Counsel
My Content
(0)
Recently viewed
(0)
Save Entry
My Searches
(0)
Recently viewed
(0)
Save Search
Print
Save
Cite
Email this content
Share Link
Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:
https://oxia.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law/9780198712268.001.0001/law-9780198712268-miscMatter-10
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.
Link copied successfully
Copy link
Sign in
You could not be signed in, please check and try again.
Username
Please enter your Username
Password
Please enter your Password
Forgot password?
Don't have an account?
Sign in via your Institution
You could not be signed in, please check and try again.
Sign in with your library card
Please enter your library card number
View translated passages only
Oxford Law Citator
Contents
Expand All
Collapse All
Preliminary Material
Dedication
General Editor’s Preface
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Contents
Table of Cases
International and Regional Cases
Ad Hoc Arbitral Tribunals
European Commission on Human Rights
European Court of Human Rights
European Court of Justice
ICSID
International Court of Justice
Iran–United States Claims Tribunal (USCTR)
London Court of International Arbitration
NAFTA
Permanent Court of Arbitration
Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ)
Stockholm Chamber of Commerce
UNCITRAL
US-Mexico General Claims Commission
WTO Appellate Body
WTO Panel
National Cases
Australia
Canada
France
Germany
India
United Kingdom
United States
Table of Legislation
International Instruments
Treaties, Conventions and Declarations
Free Trade/Partnership/Trade Promotion Agreements
Bilateral Investment Treaties
European Patent Organisation
European Union
Treaties
Regulations
Directives
National Legislation
Albania
Australia
Canada
Germany
India
Netherlands
Taiwan
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
List of Abbreviations
Main Text
1 Introduction
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
1.06
1.07
1.08
1.09
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.20
1.21
1.22
1.23
1.24
1.25
1.26
1.27
1.28
1.29
1.30
1.31
1.32
1.33
1.34
2 Background on International Investment Law and Intellectual Property
Preliminary Material
A International Investment Law
2.01
2.02
2.03
1 Redress for IP-based investments in the absence of IIAs
2.04
2.05
2.06
2.07
2.08
2.09
2.10
2 Lack of multilateral agreements and growth of IIAs, including BITs
2.11
2.12
2.13
2.14
2.15
3 Increase in FTAs containing investment protection and IP provisions
2.16
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.20
2.21
2.22
2.23
2.24
2.25
4 The growing number of investor–state arbitrations since 1990
2.26
2.27
2.28
2.29
2.30
B Intellectual Property
1 IP in the modern globalized economy
2.31
2.32
2.33
2.34
2 IP basics and theory
2.35
2.36
2.37
2.38
2.39
2.40
2.41
2.42
2.43
3 Multilateral treaties: The TRIPS Agreement
2.44
2.45
2.46
2.47
2.48
2.49
2.50
2.51
2.52
2.53
2.54
4 The growing economic importance of innovative activity
2.55
2.56
2.57
2.58
2.59
2.60
C Interaction of International Investment Law with IP-specific Treaties and Public Policies
1 Preliminary remarks
2.61
2.62
2.63
2.64
2 The interplay of IIAs and international IP treaties
(a) Legal foundations
2.65
2.66
2.67
2.68
(b) The common denominator between the TRIPS Agreement and IIAs
2.69
2.70
2.71
2.72
(c) Does international investment law allow that arbitral tribunals established under IIAs apply the TRIPS Agreement?
2.73
2.74
2.75
2.76
2.77
(d) Does WTO law allow adjudicative bodies outside the WTO system to apply the TRIPS Agreement?
2.78
2.79
2.80
2.81
2.82
2.83
2.84
2.85
2.86
2.87
2.88
2.89
2.90
2.91
3 Public policies
2.92
2.93
2.94
2.95
2.96
2.97
2.98
4 Conclusions
2.99
2.100
2.101
2.102
3 Investor–State Dispute Settlement and Review of New IP-Related Investment Cases
Preliminary Material
A Understanding the ISDS Mechanism
1 IP disputes
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
3.07
3.08
3.09
2 The power of consent under IIAs
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
3.15
3.16
3.17
3.18
3.19
3.20
3.21
3.22
3.23
3 Pre-arbitral steps and scope of consent
3.24
3.25
3.26
3.27
4 Consent and dispute resolution before ICSID and other arbitral tribunals
3.28
3.29
3.30
3.31
3.32
3.33
3.34
3.35
3.36
3.37
3.38
3.39
3.40
5 ‘Fork-in-the-road’ and ‘waiver’ clauses in IIAs in relation to IP matters before national courts or agencies
3.41
(a) FITR clauses
3.42
3.43
3.44
3.45
3.46
3.47
3.48
3.49
3.50
3.51
3.52
3.53
3.54
3.55
3.56
3.57
3.58
(b) FITR clauses and compulsory licences under Article 31(i) TRIPS Agreement
3.59
3.60
3.61
3.62
3.63
3.64
3.65
3.66
(c) Waiver clauses
3.67
3.68
3.69
3.70
3.71
3.72
6 Permanent multilateral investment court with appellate mechanism
3.73
3.74
3.75
7 Time and costs of ISDS cases
3.76
3.77
3.78
3.79
3.80
3.81
3.82
B Four Early Intellectual Property Investment Disputes
1 Jurisprudence in international investment law
3.83
3.84
3.85
3.86
3.87
3.88
2 Philip Morris v. Australia
3.89
3.90
3.91
3.92
3.93
3.94
3.95
3.96
3.97
3.98
3.99
3.100
3.101
3.102
3.103
3.104
3.105
3.106
3.107
3.108
3 Philip Morris v. Uruguay
3.109
3.110
3.111
3.112
3.113
3.114
3.115
3.116
3.117
3.118
3.119
3.120
3.121
3.122
3.123
3.124
3.125
3.126
3.127
3.128
3.129
3.130
3.131
3.132
3.133
3.134
3.135
3.136
3.137
3.138
3.139
3.140
3.141
3.142
3.143
3.144
3.145
3.146
3.147
3.148
3.149
3.150
3.151
3.152
3.153
3.154
3.155
3.156
3.157
3.158
3.159
3.160
4 Eli Lilly v. Canada
3.161
3.162
3.163
3.164
3.165
3.166
3.167
3.168
3.169
3.170
3.171
3.172
3.173
3.174
3.175
3.176
3.177
3.178
3.179
5 Bridgestone v. Panama
3.180
3.181
3.182
3.183
3.184
3.185
3.186
3.187
3.188
4 Intellectual Property as Investment
Preliminary Material
A IP as Covered ‘Investments’ in IIAs—an Overview
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
4.06
4.07
4.08
4.09
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
B Jurisdictional Proof
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
C Treaty Practice for IP as Investment
1 The term ‘investment’
4.26
4.27
4.28
4.29
4.30
4.31
4.32
4.33
4.34
4.35
4.36
4.37
4.38
4.39
4.40
4.41
4.42
4.43
4.44
4.45
2 The term ‘intellectual property’ within the definition of investment
4.46
4.47
4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
4.52
4.53
4.54
4.55
4.56
4.57
4.58
D IP as Investment under Article 25.1 of the ICSID Convention
4.59
4.60
4.61
4.62
4.63
4.64
4.65
4.66
4.67
4.68
4.69
4.70
4.71
4.72
4.73
4.74
4.75
4.76
4.77
4.78
4.79
4.80
4.81
4.82
4.83
4.84
4.85
4.86
4.87
4.88
4.89
4.90
4.91
4.92
4.93
4.94
4.95
4.96
E Role of National Law in Determining IPRs as an Investment
4.97
4.98
4.99
4.100
4.101
4.102
1 Public international law and private proprietary rights
4.103
4.104
4.105
4.106
4.107
4.108
4.109
4.110
4.111
4.112
4.113
4.114
4.115
2 Role of national law in defining legal rights underpinning investments
4.116
4.117
4.118
4.119
4.120
4.121
3 National law and IP-based investments
4.122
4.123
4.124
4.125
4.126
4 Dissenting view
4.127
4.128
4.129
5 Specific reference to national law in IIAs
4.130
4.131
4.132
4.133
4.134
4.135
4.136
4.137
4.138
4.139
4.140
4.141
6 Insufficient attention to national law
4.142
4.143
7 Decisions of national authorities
4.144
4.145
4.146
8 Limits to the role of national law
4.147
4.148
4.149
4.150
9 The harmonizing role of international IP law
4.151
4.152
4.153
10 Do BITs require the enactment of new national IP laws?
4.154
4.155
4.156
4.157
11 Applications for IP rights as protected investment under IIAs
4.158
4.159
4.160
4.161
4.162
4.163
4.164
F Review of Initial IP-Based ISDS Cases Analysing Investment
4.165
4.166
1 Trademarks
4.167
(a) Bridgestone v. Panama
4.168
4.169
4.170
4.171
4.172
4.173
4.174
4.175
4.176
4.177
4.178
4.179
4.180
4.181
4.182
4.183
(b) Philip Morris v. Uruguay
4.184
4.185
4.186
4.187
4.188
4.189
4.190
4.191
4.192
2 Copyright—Einarsson v. Canada
4.193
4.194
4.195
4.196
4.197
4.198
4.199
4.200
4.201
5 Relative Treatment Standards: National Treatment and Most-Favoured-Nation
Preliminary Material
A A Comparative Approach to Non-Discrimination Standards in International IP, Trade, and Investment Law
5.01
5.02
1 NT and MFN in international IP, trade, and investment law—an introductory comparison
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
5.07
5.08
5.09
5.10
2 Non-discrimination protection in international investment law—an overview
5.11
(a) Scope
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
5.16
(b) Comparability
5.17
5.18
5.19
5.20
(c) Standard of treatment
5.21
5.22
5.23
5.24
(d) Public interest considerations and other ‘defences’
5.25
5.26
5.27
5.28
5.29
5.30
5.31
5.32
5.33
3 A guiding role for non-discrimination approaches from WTO law?
5.34
5.35
5.36
(a) Foundations of WTO law
5.37
5.38
5.39
5.40
5.41
(b) The foundations of international investment protection
5.42
5.43
5.44
(c) The relevance of international IP law for investment protection of IP rights
5.45
5.46
5.47
5.48
5.49
5.50
B Non-Discrimination Principles in International IP Law
5.51
1 The NT standard in the PC
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
2 NT under the BC
5.59
5.60
5.61
5.62
5.63
5.64
5.65
3 Non-discrimination principles in the TRIPS Agreement
5.66
(a) The NT obligation in Article 3.1 TRIPS
5.67
5.68
5.69
5.70
5.71
5.72
5.73
5.74
5.75
(b) The MFN standard in Article 4 TRIPS
5.76
5.77
5.78
5.79
5.80
5.81
5.82
5.83
5.84
5.85
5.86
5.87
5.88
(c) The patent-specific non-discrimination rule in Article 27.1 TRIPS
5.89
5.90
5.91
5.92
5.93
C IP-Related National Treatment Claims in International Investment Law
5.94
5.95
1 Scope
5.96
(a) Pre-establishment
5.97
5.98
5.99
5.100
5.101
5.102
5.103
5.104
5.105
5.106
(b) Post-establishment
5.107
5.108
5.109
5.110
5.111
5.112
5.113
5.114
5.115
5.116
5.117
5.118
2 Comparability
5.119
(a) Comparability under NT clauses in IP treaties?
5.120
5.121
5.122
(b) Comparability in state and ISDS practice
5.123
5.124
5.125
(c) Economic comparators and their application to IP investments
5.126
5.127
5.128
5.129
5.130
5.131
(d) Regulatory framework and public interest-based differentiation
5.132
5.133
5.134
5.135
5.136
3 Standard of treatment
5.137
(a) De jure discrimination
5.138
5.139
5.140
(b) ISDS practice on de facto discrimination
5.141
5.142
5.143
5.144
5.145
(c) De facto discrimination in IP cases
5.146
5.147
5.148
5.149
5.150
4 Justification and defences
5.151
(a) Public interest considerations in IIAs
5.152
5.153
5.154
5.155
5.156
(b) Diverging ISDS practice
5.157
5.158
5.159
5.160
5.161
5.162
5.163
5.164
(c) Justifying IP measures
5.165
(i) The role of domestic and international IP law
5.166
5.167
5.168
5.169
(ii) Justifying alleged de facto discrimination
5.170
5.171
5.172
(iii) Justifying alleged de jure discrimination
5.173
5.174
5.175
5.176
5.177
5.178
D IP-Related MFN Claims in International Investment Law
5.179
1 The MFN standard in international investment law
5.180
5.181
5.182
5.183
5.184
2 State and ISDS practice relevant for IP-based investments
5.185
(a) MFN clauses and their limits in state practice
5.186
5.187
5.188
5.189
5.190
(b) ISDS practice relevant for IP-based investments
5.191
5.192
5.193
(i) Scope of investment and investor protection
5.194
5.195
5.196
(ii) Substantive investment standards
5.197
5.198
5.199
5.200
5.201
5.202
5.203
5.204
(iii) Protections under international IP treaties
5.205
5.206
5.207
5.208
5.209
5.210
6 Absolute Standards of Treatment: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Full Protection and Security
Preliminary Material
A Absolute Standards of Treatment and IP: An Introduction
6.01
1 FET and FPS—concepts, context, and key debates
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
2 Elements of FET in ISDS and treaty practice
6.08
(a) The development of FET through arbitral practice
6.09
6.10
6.11
6.12
(b) State responses to ISDS practice
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.16
6.17
B Protecting IP-Based Investments under FET and FPS
6.18
6.19
6.20
1 Reasonable reliance on legitimate expectations
6.21
6.22
(a) Legitimate expectations based on the grant of an IP right
6.23
6.24
6.25
6.26
6.27
6.28
(b) Legitimate expectations based on the domestic IP law of the host state
6.29
6.30
6.31
6.32
6.33
6.34
6.35
6.36
6.37
6.38
6.39
6.40
6.41
6.42
6.43
(c) International IP treaty provisions as source of legitimate expectations
6.44
6.45
6.46
6.47
6.48
6.49
6.50
6.51
6.52
6.53
2 Denial of justice and FPS applied to IP rights as protected investments
6.54
6.55
6.56
(a) The contours of denial of justice in the context of IP-based investments
6.57
6.58
6.59
6.60
6.61
(b) Procedural propriety, fairness, and due process
6.62
6.63
6.64
6.65
6.66
6.67
6.68
6.69
6.70
6.71
6.72
6.73
(c) Review of the content of a judicial act
6.74
6.75
6.76
6.77
6.78
6.79
6.80
6.81
6.82
6.83
6.84
(d) Full protection and security for IP-based investments
6.85
6.86
6.87
6.88
6.89
6.90
6.91
6.92
6.93
3 Further elements of FET with specific relevance for IP rights
6.94
(a) Coercion, abuse of power, and harassment
6.95
6.96
6.97
6.98
(b) Compliance with contractual obligations
6.99
6.100
6.101
(c) Transparency
6.102
6.103
6.104
6.105
6.106
C Justifications, Defences, and Balancing Mechanisms
6.107
1 Approaches in IIAs
6.108
6.109
6.110
6.111
6.112
6.113
2 ISDS practice
6.114
6.115
6.116
6.117
6.118
6.119
6.120
6.121
6.122
6.123
3 Absence of substantive unfairness
6.124
(a) Lack of arbitrariness
6.125
6.126
6.127
6.128
6.129
6.130
(b) Absence of discrimination
6.131
6.132
6.133
6.134
6.135
6.136
6.137
7 Expropriation
Preliminary Material
A Expropriation—An Introduction
7.01
7.02
7.03
7.04
7.05
7.06
7.07
7.08
B Expropriation—Concepts and Context
7.09
1 Three key issues in expropriation
7.10
(a) Subject of expropriation
7.11
7.12
7.13
7.14
7.15
7.16
7.17
7.18
7.19
7.20
7.21
7.22
7.23
7.24
7.25
7.26
7.27
7.28
7.29
7.30
7.31
(b) Event of expropriation
7.32
7.33
7.34
7.35
7.36
(c) Level of compensation
7.37
7.38
2 Indirect expropriation
7.39
7.40
7.41
7.42
7.43
7.44
7.45
7.46
7.47
(a) Sole effects
7.48
7.49
(b) Police powers
7.50
7.51
7.52
7.53
7.54
7.55
7.56
7.57
7.58
7.59
(c) Legitimate expectations
7.60
7.61
7.62
7.63
7.64
7.65
7.66
7.67
7.68
7.69
7.70
7.71
7.72
7.73
7.74
7.75
(d) Burden of proof
7.76
7.77
7.78
(e) Conditions for legal expropriation
7.79
(i) Public purpose
7.80
7.81
7.82
7.83
7.84
7.85
7.86
7.87
7.88
7.89
7.90
7.91
(ii) Due process
7.92
7.93
7.94
7.95
7.96
7.97
(iii) Non-discrimination
7.98
7.99
7.100
7.101
7.102
(iv) Compensation
7.103
7.104
7.105
7.106
7.107
7.108
7.109
7.110
7.111
7.112
C Expropriation in Treaty Practice
7.113
7.114
7.115
7.116
7.117
7.118
7.119
7.120
7.121
7.122
7.123
7.124
7.125
7.126
7.127
7.128
7.129
7.130
7.131
7.132
7.133
7.134
7.135
7.136
7.137
7.138
7.139
7.140
7.141
7.142
D Applying the Expropriation Standard to IP-Based Investments
7.143
7.144
1 Eli Lilly v. Canada
7.145
7.146
7.147
7.148
7.149
7.150
7.151
7.152
7.153
7.154
7.155
7.156
7.157
2 Philip Morris v. Uruguay
7.158
7.159
7.160
7.161
7.162
7.163
7.164
7.165
7.166
7.167
7.168
7.169
7.170
3 Compulsory licensing and expropriation
(a) Background on compulsory licensing
7.171
7.172
7.173
7.174
7.175
7.176
(b) Assessing compulsory licensing as an indirect expropriation
7.177
7.178
7.179
7.180
7.181
7.182
7.183
7.184
7.185
7.186
7.187
7.188
7.189
7.190
7.191
7.192
7.193
7.194
7.195
7.196
7.197
7.198
7.199
7.200
7.201
7.202
7.203
7.204
7.205
7.206
7.207
7.208
7.209
7.210
4 Bridgestone Licensing v. Panama
7.211
7.212
7.213
5 Einarsson v. Canada
7.214
7.215
7.216
7.217
7.218
8 Outlook
Preliminary Material
8.01
8.02
A The General Dynamics of International Investment Law
8.03
8.04
8.05
8.06
8.07
8.08
B A Gradually Developing IP–Investment Interface
8.09
8.10
8.11
8.12
8.13
8.14
8.15
8.16
8.17
8.18
8.19
8.20
Further Material
Select Bibliography
Index
Sign up for alerts
Table of Cases
Simon Klopschinski, Christopher S. Gibson, Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan
From:
The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Under International Investment Law
Simon Klopschinski, Christopher Gibson, Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan
Content type:
Book content
Product:
Investment Claims [IC]
Series:
Oxford International Arbitration Series
Published in print:
23 December 2020
ISBN:
9780198712268
Prev
|
Next
[18.206.13.203]
18.206.13.203