Jump to Content Jump to Main Navigation
Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Limited v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration & Production Company Limited (“Bapex”) and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation (“Petrobangla”), Procedural order no 22 (Privilege Asserted Against the Production of the Deloitte Documents), ICSID Case No ARB/10/11, ICSID Case No ARB/10/18, IIC 997 (2017), 27th July 2017, World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Limited v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration & Production Company Limited (“Bapex”) and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation (“Petrobangla”), Procedural order no 22 (Privilege Asserted Against the Production of the Deloitte Documents), ICSID Case No ARB/10/11, ICSID Case No ARB/10/18, IIC 997 (2017), 27th July 2017, World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]

1. At the April 2017 evidentiary hearing on the Corruption Claim [undisclosed] made reference to an investigation (also referred to as “audit”) conducted at the instruction of a subcommittee of the Board of Directors of Niko Resources Ltd (Niko Canada) by Deloitte & Touche Forensic & Investigative Services Inc., Calgary (“Deloitte”) in connection with the corruption allegations by the Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). Specifically, [undisclosed] mentioned a PowerPoint presentation concerning the results of...
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.